A marathon UN summit has wrapped up with little to show, squeezing hard-earned compromises from countries over a global warming battle plan that fell well short of what science says is needed to tackle the climate crisis.
The COP25 deal "expresses the urgent need" for new carbon cutting commitments to close the gap between current emissions and the Paris treaty goal of capping temperature at below two degrees, host country Spain said in a statement.
"Today the citizens of the world are asking for us to move ahead faster and better, in financing, adaptation, mitigation," Carolina Schmidt, Chilean environment minister and President of COP25, told the closing plenary.
Following a year of deadly extreme weather and weekly strikes by millions of young people demanding action, negotiations in Madrid were under pressure to send a clear signal that governments were willing to double down.
The summit - moved at the last minute from Chile due to unrest - at times teetered on the brink of collapse as rich polluters, emerging powerhouses and climate-vulnerable nations groped for common ground in the face of competing national interests.
"Based on the adopted text, there is a glimmer of hope that the heart of the Paris Agreement is still beating," said Mohamed Adow, Director of Power Shift, referring the treaty inked in the French capital. "But its pulse is very weak."
Negotiators from nearly 200 nations came to Spain's capital with the aim of finalising the rulebook for the 2015 agreement, which enjoins nations to limit global temperature to below two degrees Celsius.
Limited progress and a partial agreement that all countries must be more ambitious in their plans to tackle climate change ahead of the operation of the Paris climate accord from the end of next year.
But a decision too, to kick most of the major decisions about emissions reductions, finance, and carbon markets down the road to the next climate summit COP26 to take place in Glasgow in December next year.
It's not much after 14 days of tough talking among 192 nations. And it's not much of a response in a year which has seen the largest mobilisation of civil society groups demanding governments do more to tackle climate change the world over.
Climate activists are deeply frustrated with the outcome and have accused the Chilean presidency of being captured by large countries with major fossil fuel interests and big corporations determined to stymie attempts to get agreement for more restrictions on fossil fuels.
Civil society groups say the outcome of the COP25 negotiations underscores that the gap between what governments are trying to achieve and what is happening on street level in relation to demands for climate action has never been wider, and they have vowed to increase climate related street protests in the months ahead.
'Missing in action'
With the accord set to become operational next year, it had been hoped COP25 would show the world that governments would be moved by protests, irrefutable science, and deadly storms and wildfires that marked 2019 to redouble their efforts.
But greater ambition - how far each country is willing to slash carbon emissions or assist less wealthy peers to do likewise - has largely failed to materialise.
Veteran observers of UN climate talks were stunned by the state of play.
"Never have I seen such a disconnect between what the science requires and what the climate negotiations are delivering in terms of meaningful action," said Alden Meyer, director of strategy and policy at the Union of Concerned Scientists and a 28-year veteran of the climate process.
"Most of the world's biggest emitting countries are missing in action and resisting calls to raise their ambition."
The push for a strengthening of voluntary carbon cutting plans is led by small-island and least-developed states, along with the European Union.
These have called out nations they see as blocking consensus for all countries to step up, notably the United States, Australia and Saudi Arabia.
China and India, the world's No. 1 and No. 4 carbon emitters, made it clear they see no need to improve on their current emissions reduction plans, which run to 2030.
These emerging giants chose instead to emphasise the historical responsibility of rich nations to lead the way and provide financing to poor countries.
"Major players who needed to deliver in Madrid did not live up to expectations," said Laurence Tubiana, CEO of the European Climate Foundation and, as France top negotiator, a main architect of the Paris Agreement.
"But thanks to a progressive alliance of small island states, European, African and Latin American countries, we obtained the best possible outcome, against the will of big polluters."
'Loss and damage'
The summit was also meant to finalise a chapter on carbon markets in the Paris rulebook.
Some nations, notably Brazil and Australia, want to count carbon credits accumulated under a previous climate deal as part of their commitments under the Paris goals.
Discussions over markets ended in impasse today and the issue will to be handed over to next year's COP26 in Glasgow.
The US, which is leaving the Paris deal next year, was accused of playing spoiler on a number of issues vital to climate-vulnerable nations.
This included so-called "loss and damage" funding to help disaster-hit countries repair and rebuild.
"The US has not come here in good faith," said Harjeet Singh, climate lead with charity ActionAid.
"They continue to block the world's efforts to help people whose lives have been turned upside down by climate change."
Even if all countries implement their current plans under Paris, Earth is on course to warm more than 3C by 2100.
The failure to get the rulebook finalised in Madrid mean all eyes will be on Glasgow 2020 - when the true Paris deal deadline falls.
"We must all act quickly, working in partnership to decarbonise our economies and adapt to the impact of climate change," Archie Young, Britain's Head of International Climate Change Negotiations said.