Lyle and Erik Menendez, who have spent more than three decades behind bars for the murders of their parents in Los Angeles, could soon walk free after a judge reduced their life sentences.
The ruling came after a court hearing during which the men took full responsibility for the 1989 double killing at the family's Beverley Hills home.
"I do believe they've done enough over the last 35 years that one day they should get that chance" to be freed, Judge Michael Jesic said, delivering a ruling that makes the brothers eligible for parole.
The brothers, held in custody since March 1990 and originally sentenced in July 1996 to two consecutive life terms without the possibility of parole, were each handed a new sentence of 50 years to life by Judge Jesic.
Now 57 and 54 years of age, the brothers will remain incarcerated while the state parole board and California Governor Gavin Newsom ultimately decide their fate.
As they have for a series of previous hearings, the brothers appeared for yesterday's proceeding via video link from prison in San Diego.
Judge Jesic called their crime "absolutely horrific" but said it was "amazing" how they had rehabilitated themselves in prison.
"It's something I've never seen before," he said.
Addressing the court before the judge rendered his decision, both defendants apologised to their families, expressed remorse for the killings and said they took "full responsibility" for their behaviour.
"My crime was not just criminal. It was wrong. It was immoral. It was cruel and it was vicious," said Erik Menendez, who was 18 when he and his older brother opened fire on their parents with 12-gauge shotguns.
"Today, 35 years later, I am deeply ashamed of who I was," said Lyle Menendez, who was 21 at the time of the murders.
The brothers were re-sentenced under California's youthful offender statute, which applies to defendants who were under 26 when they committed a crime and makes them immediately eligible for parole once they serve half of their term.
"They had tears and they were smiling," Menendez attorney Cliff Gardner told Los Angeles television station KNBC-TV, relaying what he saw from the video link in court immediately after the ruling.
After a first trial ended in a hung jury in 1994, the brothers were found guilty by a second jury in 1996 of first-degree murder for fatally shooting their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez, on 20 August 1989, as the couple watched television in the family room of their home.
At trial, the brothers admitted to committing the killings but insisted they did so out of fear that their parents were about to kill them following years of sexual abuse by their father, a wealthy entertainment industry executive, and emotional battering by their mother.
Prosecutors argued the murders were coldly calculated and motivated by greed, namely the brothers' desire to inherit their parents' multi million-dollar fortune.
Mark Geragos, attorney for the Menendez brothers, and family member Anamaria Baralt speak outside court after the hearing
Former District Attorney George Gascon petitioned for a re-sentencing last autumn, citing new evidence purported to bolster the brothers' claims that they were abused and a prison record showing they had achieved rehabilitation while incarcerated.
But Mr Gascon's successor as DA, Nathan Hochman, opposed the re-sentencing, arguing the brothers had yet to fully acknowledge and accept responsibility for the killings.
The outcome yesterday capped a day-long hearing in which several relatives, a retired judge and a former fellow inmate testified in support of defence efforts to gain the brothers' release.
The brothers' first cousin Anamaria Baralt, a leading advocate for their release, said the two "are universally forgiven" by everyone on both sides of their family.
"They are different men from the boys that they were when they committed these crimes," she testified.
Two other cousins said the brothers should be credited for their exemplary record behind bars, citing Lyle's work bringing a "Greenspace" beautification project to the prison and Erik's role in hospice care for fellow inmates.
Prosecutor Habib Balian, however, said the brothers wer e"not trustworthy" and he did not believe they had found redemption. He also said he was not assured by family members' testimony that they did not think the brothers would commit another violent crime.
"We know ... what they are capable of doing," he said.
Before they can go free, the brothers must make their case next to the state parole board, which will recommend whether they are suitable for release. The final decision will rest with the governor, who can either accept or reject the board's recommendation.
In addition, the state Board of Parole Hearings has set hearings for 13 June to decide whether to support separate petitions for clemency, which also would require Mr Newsom's approval.
In seeking the brothers' release, defence lawyers presented new evidence to bolster their claims of sexual abuse, including a letter Erik purportedly wrote to a cousin eight months before the killings describing molestation by his father and allegations from a member of the 1980s pop band Menudo, who said he was abused by Jose Menendez.
The allegations were highlighted in a 2023 documentary series on Peacock about the case, while a nine-part Netflix drama and a documentary film last autumn also renewed public interest.
Diane Hernandez, niece of Kitty Menendez, said the brothers were "remarkable human beings."
"There is absolutely no chance that they would break the law" if released, she said. "Their only desire is to do good."
We need your consent to load this rte-player contentWe use rte-player to manage extra content that can set cookies on your device and collect data about your activity. Please review their details and accept them to load the content.Manage Preferences
