skip to main content

New garda ombudsman will need 'double the staff of GSOC'

The Garda Síochána Ombudsman Commission is to be replaced by a new body
The Garda Síochána Ombudsman Commission is to be replaced by a new body

The new garda ombudsman will need "at least double" the current number of staff employed at the Garda Síochána Ombudsman Commission (GSOC), the Dáil's public accounts committee has heard.

Legislation to establish Fiosrú - the Office of the Police Ombudsman - passed through the Oireachtas last week.

GSOC chair Mr Justice Rory McCabe told TDs that an independent assessment of GSOC found that it's staff numbers will have to double, in order to facilitate the establishment of Fiosrú in July.

The former High Court judge pointed to a Grant Thornton report which was published last summer and recommended that at least 180 additional staff be recruited, and possibly as many as 239, depending on work flow.

"In broad terms, and over a phased period, a minimum of a doubling of our current staff complement, including a considerable increase in our complement of investigative staff, will be essential," he said.

Overall, GSOC has 23 vacancies and 163 staff, Mr MacCabe said.

The new organisation will have new structures, new management and a lot more work, the committee heard.

TDs also heard that the number of protected disclosures to GSOC rose by more than half last year.

GSOC received 28 disclosures in 2023, its Director of Operations Peter Whelan revealed. This compares to 18 the year before.

But the unit which handles the complaints, and consists of seven posts, is "finding it difficult" to fill two vacancies, Mr Whelan added.

Staff shortages are also slowing the first stage of processing any complaint.

There is a "backlog with admissibility complaints," Mr Whelan said.

"We've had some struggles there with staff numbers."


Read more: GSOC needs more staff and resources, committee told


Fianna Fáil TD Cormac Devlin highlighted nine cases which have been open for four to five years, and 19 others open for three to four years.

His party colleague, Paul McAuliffe TD referenced the public scandal surrounding the resignation of a GSOC investigator last year, and asked what changes had been made to recruitment processes.

The ombudsman has "a shared interest" with gardaí in both organisations introducing "ongoing vetting" for staff, Mr MacCabe responded.

He added that all cases that the investigator had been involved with were put under review.

The riots in Dublin had brought into focus a sense that gardaí were having to look over their shoulders lest they fall foul of GSOC, Mr McAuliffe suggested.

Five complaints relating to policing that day had been made to the ombudsman with two of them having been withdrawn, the committee heard.

Mr McAuliffe asked if the Dublin riots last year highlighted a reluctance on the part of gardaí to use force.

GSOC said it was a matter for the Garda Commissioner to define the parameters of force.

GSOC Commissioner Emily Logan pointed to research carried out in the wake of the riots by Assistant Garda Commissioner Paul Cleary.

He found that "less than 5%" of officers who had replied to a questionnaire "had a lack of confidence in the use of force".

Ms Logan said that this is "sharply at variance from the media commentary" on the riots.

Labour's Alan Kelly strongly disagreed.

Expressing a "deep concern" at GSOC's track record, he said that issues underlying the "recruitment and retention issue" in the force were "manifested" in the riots.

"Gardaí were afraid to act," he said.