skip to main content

Man challenges State's decision to stop his pandemic payment

Like many thousands of workers, Mihai Adrian Hofman began to receive the PUP in late March of this year
Like many thousands of workers, Mihai Adrian Hofman began to receive the PUP in late March of this year

A man has brought a High Court challenge against the State's decision to stop paying him the Covid-19 Pandemic Unemployment Payment after he temporarily left the State for family reasons.

The action has been taken by Mihai Adrian Hofman, a Romanian man who has resided in Ireland since 2010.

Like many thousands of workers, Mr Hofman, who works as a chef, began to receive the PUP in late March of this year.

In late June he had to return to Romania due to a family emergency. Arising out of him leaving the State his PUP was unilaterally ceased.

He returned to Ireland on 21 July. He had intended to return a week earlier but was prevented from doing so due to a flight cancellation. 

He claims that the decision was unreasonable and flew in the face of common sense and was wrong in law. 

As an Irish resident he was entitled to the PUP, it is claimed.

In addition, he claims the decision was unlawful because he was not given notice of nor an opportunity to address the issues as to why his PUP was being stopped.

He attempted to have his PUP restored, and his arrears discharged. However, the Minister has refused to do that.

As a result, Mr Hofman, with an address at Willowbrook Lodge, Celbridge Co Kildare, has brought proceedings against the Minister for Social Protection, Ireland and the Attorney General.

In his action Mr Hofman seeks orders quashing the Minister's decision to refuse to reinstate his payments and make back payments to him.

He also seeks declarations including that the Minister erred in law in ceasing Mr Hofman's PUP, and that he was entitled to notice, and an opportunity to address issues raised by the Minister before the payment was stopped.  

Counsel for Mr Hofman, Derek Shortall SC, with Brendan Hennessy Bl, told the court that a similar action had come before the courts in recent weeks, but that action had been resolved.  

The matter came before Mr Justice Charles Meenan, who on an ex-parte basis granted Mr Hofman permission to bring his challenge.

The judge made the matter returnable to a date in January.