The European Council President Donald Tusk and the Government have both said that the Withdrawal Agreement is not open for renegotiation after British MPs gave their backing to proposals to replace the backstop.
A spokesman for Mr Tusk has said that the backstop is part of the Withdrawal Agreement and the Withdrawal Agreement is not open for renegotiation.
Mr Tusk was responding to a vote in the House of Commons this evening where British MPs authorised Prime Minister Theresa May to go back to Brussels to try to renegotiate her Brexit deal.
"The Withdrawal Agreement is and remains the best and only way to ensure an orderly withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union.
"The backstop is part of the Withdrawal Agreement, and the Withdrawal Agreement is not open for re-negotiation."
"The December European Council conclusions are very clear on this point.
"We will continue our preparations for all outcomes, including a no-deal scenario. We will also continue the EU's process of ratification of the agreement reached with the UK Government," said the statement.
If there were to be a request for an extension of Article 50, the statement continued, the EU27: "Would stand ready to consider it and decide by unanimity. The EU27 will adopt this decision, taking into account the reasons for and duration of a possible extension, as well as the need to ensure the functioning of the EU institutions."
"President Tusk will stay in close contact with EU27 leaders," the statement concluded.
Theresa May says the UK will seek 'legally binding changes to the Withdrawal Agreement that deal with concerns on the backstop' pic.twitter.com/fF0sPgDPIO— RTÉ News (@rtenews) January 29, 2019
A Government statement also reiterated that the Withdrawal Agreement is not open for re-negotiation.
In a statement issued this evening, the Government said the EU position on the Withdrawal Agreement, including the backstop, "has not changed".
It said the best way to ensure an orderly withdrawal is to ratify the Withdrawal Agreement.
The statement also said a change in the UK red lines could lead to a change in the Political Declaration on the framework for the future relationship, and a better overall outcome.
We need your consent to load this rte-player contentWe use rte-player to manage extra content that can set cookies on your device and collect data about your activity. Please review their details and accept them to load the content.Manage Preferences
Backstop was agreed by UK/EU as the insurance policy to avoid a hard border in all scenarios. We hope it will never be used, or be replaced quickly by a future relationship agreement. But it is necessary and tonight’s developments at Westminster do nothing to change this. #Brexit— Simon Coveney (@simoncoveney) January 29, 2019
Fianna Fáil's Brexit spokesperson Lisa Chambers said she was disappointed to see the amendment passed in Westminster calling for "alternatives arrangements" to the backstop.
She called on the UK to clarify what are the "alternative arrangements" to avoiding a hard border.
Sinn Féin's Brexit spokesperson David Cullinane called on the Irish Government and the EU to hold firm.
He said Mrs May was deluding herself if she thinks she can negotiate legally binding changes to the Backstop.
"She is hoping that the EU and Ireland blinks as the Tories threaten all with a hard crash Brexit," he said.
The vote by MPs has been described as "the ultimate betrayal" by the leader of the SDLP.
Speaking to RTÉ News, Colum Eastwood said: "They are messing around with the Good Friday Agreement, with our peace process and with all the progress that we have made.
"It's very important that the Irish Government and the EU stand firm behind the people of Northern Ireland who are very, very worried tonight".