skip to main content

Updated Seven arrested following racist incidents in La Liga

Carlo Ancelotti speaks to Vinicius Jr during Real Madrid's clash against Valencia on Sunday
Carlo Ancelotti speaks to Vinicius Jr during Real Madrid's clash against Valencia on Sunday

Police have detained seven men over separate alleged hate crime incidents against Real Madrid player Vinicius Jr as La Liga urged changes to Spanish law that would enable it to take steps to curb racism in stadiums.

Real Madrid manager Carlo Ancelotti expressed support for Vinicius Jr, whom he expected would remain at the club.

He lambasted Spain's "obsolete" protocols to deal with racism in the sport, and said he would consider taking his players off the pitch if they were to be abused again during a game.

Puma, sponsor of both Valencia and La Liga, also offered its support to Vinicius Jr, as did Spanish bank Santander, whose title sponsorship with La Liga ends after this season.

"At Puma, we do not tolerate racism, we condemn discrimination in any form and stand in solidarity with Vinicius Junior," Puma said in a statement.

A hate crime investigation was opened after an inflatable effigy dressed in the number 20 jersey of winger Vinicius Jr was hung from a bridge in front of the club's training grounds.

Alongside it was a large red and white banner - the colours of rival team Atletico Madrid - that read "Madrid hates Real".

Four men were arrested in Madrid, police said, three of whom were members of "a radical group of fans of a Madrid club", who were previously flagged during matches as "high risk" to help curb violence during games.

Three men were also arrested in Valencia for racist conduct aimed at Vinicius in a match between Valencia and Real Madrid, police said on Twitter.

After slurs were aimed at Vinicius Jr during a Spanish league match on Sunday, Vinicius Jr, in a social media post, called the racist abuse "inhuman" and asked sponsors and broadcasters to hold La Liga accountable.

La Liga said in a statement that it felt "impotent" to tackle the issue while Spanish legislation limited its actions to merely detecting and reporting racist incidents.

It urged that the law to be modified so that it could cancel matches and ban fans from stadiums if racist behaviour is detected.

"La Liga is extremely frustrated by the lack of sanctions and convictions by sporting disciplinary bodies, public administrations and courts public administrations and the jurisdictional bodies to which complaints are made," it said in a statement.

Vinicius has expressed frustration that La Liga has not exerted pressure on the Spanish football federation, which does have the power to apply stadium closures and bans, according to sources close to the player.

The federation can cancel a match if racist insults continue after a 10-minute period in which the game is paused and the crowd warned. To date, no match in Spain has enforced it.

The Brazilian player was particularly aggrieved by comments made by La Liga president Javier Tebas on Sunday, in which he accused the player of failing to turn up to meetings so that La Liga could explain what it has been doing to address racism, sources close to the player told Reuters.

Vinicius was initially receptive to a meeting if it was held behind closed doors, according to the sources, but turned it down believing the La Liga administrator was seeking publicity by holding it at its Madrid offices.

La Liga declined to comment on the proposed meeting with Vinicius while the football federation did not respond to a request for comment about its powers to cancel matches.

The federation and La Liga said they were launching a campaign until the end of the season against racism.

They also said Valencia's south stand will be partially closed for five matches and the club fined €45,000 and confirmed that Vinicius will not be suspended for the red card he received in the Valencia match.

"The RFEF Competition Committee considers that the referee's assessment was determined by the omission of the entirety of the play that took place, which affected the refereeing decision," the RFEF said.

"The fact that he (the referee) was deprived of a decisive part of the facts led him to adopt an arbitrary decision. And this is because it was impossible for him to properly assess what happened."

We need your consent to load this rte-player contentWe use rte-player to manage extra content that can set cookies on your device and collect data about your activity. Please review their details and accept them to load the content.Manage Preferences

Listen to the RTÉ Soccer podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.

Read Next