skip to main content

EU outlines plans for European trade dispute court

In the EU-US agreement, judges would be appointed by the EU and US, and could not act as lawyers in cases
In the EU-US agreement, judges would be appointed by the EU and US, and could not act as lawyers in cases

The European Union's trade chief has outlined a plan for a new European court system to settle trade disputes, aiming to unblock negotiations with the United States and achieve the world's biggest free-trade agreement.

Fears that US multinationals could use private arbitration rules in the proposed trade pact to challenge European food and environmental laws have overshadowed a transatlantic project meant to ease business and compete with China's economic might.

"We want to establish a new system built around the elements that make citizens trust domestic or international courts," EU Trade Commissioner Cecilia Malmstrom told a news conference.

"The old, traditional form of dispute resolution suffers from a fundamental lack of trust," she said, following up on an earlier, less detailed plan on 5 May.

The idea of a 15-judge court system with an appeal tribunal open to the media and others should allow EU trade negotiators to restart discussions with Washington on the issue of investor-to-state disputes, or ISDS, by the end of this year.

The court system could become a feature of the EU's trade agreements around the world, becoming multinational.

In the EU-US agreement, judges would be appointed by the EU and US, and could not act as lawyers in cases.

Negotiations on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), which would encompass a third of world trade, are already under way, but talks on ISDS were suspended by Ms Malmstrom's predecessor because of public opposition.

While many businesses welcome the trade accord to create a market of 800m people, hoping it will add over €88bn a year to economic output on both sides of the Atlantic, European consumers, particularly in Germany and Austria, are very wary.

Some note a US tobacco company's use of ISDS to challenge Australia's laws on cigarette packaging. They worry about special privileges for private investors.

EU lawmakers and non-governmental organisations both praised and damned the Commission's proposal, meaning its passage to become operational is likely to be difficult.

The US says ISDS must be in any deal.