skip to main content

Paddington Bear owners take Spitting Image legal action

StudioCanal, which makes the Paddington films, and Paddington and Company are bringing legal action against Avalon, producer of the puppet-based satirical series Spitting Image, at the High Court in London
StudioCanal, which makes the Paddington films, and Paddington and Company are bringing legal action against Avalon, producer of the puppet-based satirical series Spitting Image, at the High Court in London

The owners of Paddington Bear want a "frightening" puppet used on the show Spitting Image delivered to them or destroyed, according to court documents in London.

StudioCanal, which makes the Paddington films, and Paddington and Company are bringing legal action against Avalon, producer of the puppet-based satirical series, at the High Court in London.

Spitting Image made a return to TV after 24 years in 2020 and is now available on YouTube in short-form vodcast-style episodes called The Rest Is Bulls*!t, in a nod to the Goalhanger Podcasts that begin with the title The Rest Is.

Paddington and Company and StudioCanal, along with two of late Paddington author Michael Bond's relatives, have filed a claim over alleged copyright infringement in four of these episodes and a trailer for the Spitting Image musical.

In a court document, their lawyers claim that a puppet with "all the features of the appearance of Paddington" is used in a derogatory way in the episodes.

The court was told that a puppet with bulging, bloodshot eyes or dishevelled fur is called Paddington, who is said to be from Peru, and references marmalade.

"The Avalon puppet depicts the Paddington character with a frightening demeanour," barrister Tom St Quintin continued in the document.

Mr St Quintin claimed that the episodes show Paddington as a cocaine user, with one of the episodes also depicting the bear as a cocaine smuggler, an alcoholic, and a user of heroin, while another shows Paddington "as a promoter of gun sales and sex robots".

Three episodes depict Paddington as a user of "coarse language", the barrister added, with each episode said to use an accent for the puppet that mocks Peruvian people.

He later told the court the episodes were a "distortion or mutilation" of the portrayal of Paddington in the books, where the bear is described as polite, well-meaning, and truthful.

The companies are seeking an injunction, as well as an order requiring the delivery of the puppet or its destruction and potential damages.

Avalon has not yet filed a defence to the claim.

However, Spitting Image co-writer Al Murray previously told the Radio Times that he and fellow writer Matt Forde were "baffled" by the legal action.

He said: "It's a very Spitting Image thing to do - to take someone and say: 'Hey, maybe they're the opposite...'"

In a video posted to the Spitting Image YouTube channel earlier this month, a puppet depiction of Britain's Duke of Sussex asks 'Pads' what he makes of the legal letters.

The second puppet appears to use a piece of paper to ingest white powder, before saying: "Paddington goes to party town."

"Do remember to like and subscribe before Paddington gets cancelled," the Prince Harry puppet later says.

Paddington, first published in 1958, has seen a number of adaptations over the years, including a BBC TV version in 1976 voiced by the late Michael Hordern.

StudioCanal's Paddington films were released in 2014, 2017, and 2024, and a musical adaptation is due to launch in London with a preview on 1 November.

Source: Press Association

Read Next