The UK's papers have joined the calls for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex to give up their royal titles.
The British papers took issue with the couple for attacking Britain’s institutions in their tell-all Netflix documentary.
The Daily Mail described the series as "little more than a hatchet job from start to finish".
The paper’s editorial states: "What is so infuriating is that the Sussexes continue to make millions out of their royal connections while trashing the institution that sustains them.
"If they loathe the monarchy so much, why not voluntarily give up their titles? They won’t because that would mean losing their meal ticket.
"In her first major speech in 1947, the soon-to-be Queen declared that her whole life would be devoted to public service. How deeply sad that her grandson and his wife are dedicated only to serving themselves."
Under the headline "Meg it stop", The Sun also suggests the pair give up their titles to "bring this sorry soap opera to an end".
"Harry and Meg's game is clear," the editorial adds.
"This was a docuseries made for an American audience — cementing their money-making potential in the US — and to hell with everything and everybody else, including the truth."
The Sussexes’ claims of racism are wrong and possibly come from a lack of understanding about the royal family, according to The Daily Telegraph.
"In their self-indulgent introspections, the couple appear confused about, or perhaps resentful of, the unique dual role performed by the monarchy, at once both family and institution, which means that, however unusual it is, hierarchy permeates and animates it," the Telegraph's editorial states.
"This naturally meant that the duke’s elder brother, William, directly in line to the throne, a future head of state, would be treated differently to him.
"Here was no personal slight, but a simple recognition of the institutional facts, which have safeguarded the monarchy, and the stability of the British constitution, for centuries.
"It is sad that the Sussexes found this difference of treatment upsetting, but it should not have come as a surprise. And, directed by protocol, it was certainly not motivated by race."
The Daily Express says in its editorial that the couple should "pull the plug on their Netflix show before they disgrace themselves and further hurt a nation and a family still mourning the loss of the Queen".
The paper adds: "It is understood there is deep sadness in the royal family that it 'has come to this’. That regret is shared across the country."
The Daily Mirror takes a wide view of the royal feuding against the backdrop of the cost-of-living crisis.
Voice of the Mirror says: "Wherever responsibility lies, the conduct is unbecoming and deeply damaging to the reputation of the monarchy.
"The royals risk losing public support if they persist with their feuding and score-settling at a time when people are having to rely on foodbanks and cannot afford to heat their homes.
"Their behaviour is not just disrespectful to the memory of the Queen and an institution she served so dutifully.
"It shows a disregard for those who are facing real hardship and privation."
The Daily Star comments on the apparent hypocrisy of the ‘publicity-shy’ pair displaying their lives on a global streaming service.
The paper says: "There’s something strange about the decision by the publicity-shy couple to release an intimate documentary about their lives.
"It doesn’t really tally with their apparent desire for privacy. But then nothing this bashful pair do really makes sense."
Elsewhere, major US media outlets offered mostly unfavourable takes on the tell-all documentary.
Variety’s chief television critic, Daniel D’Addario, said that the couple had previously "shocked the world multiple times over" – both with the infamous "Megxit" and subsequent interview with Oprah Winfrey in March 2021.
"With today’s release… the Sussexes surprise us yet again, with just how narrow their vision of their fame is, how pinched and unimaginative their presence on the world stage has become," he wrote.
"They may have shed their responsibilities to the crown, but they’re still in a kind of service.
"There’s an air of duty about the entire enterprise of 'Harry & Meghan,’ as if they’re honor-bound to keep reciting their personal story until we eventually lose interest."
But Stephanie Bunbury, of Deadline, said the episodes were not "the royal evisceration we have been expecting".
"The story so far is a straightforward romance, with the best-looking royals no longer in the business seen sitting on a couch agreeing that, guess what, they fell madly in love on their second date," she wrote.
"None of this, however, is the royal evisceration we have been expecting.
"Presumably, the Harry Formerly Known As a Prince and his maligned wife will go into a bit more detail in next week’s Volume II on what prompted them to walk away from the whole thing and set up shop in California."
Writers for The Hollywood Reporter agreed that despite viewers experiencing "an intimate retelling" of Harry and Meghan’s "great love story" there was no "truly groundbreaking content".
"While expectations of what the documentary might reveal were high, the audience is not enlightened about anything truly groundbreaking in the first three episodes," a THR article read.
The next instalment of the six-part series is due to be released next week on 15 December.
