The Club Players Association has dubbed the GAA's latest proposals to reform the playing calendar "inadequate" and said they fall "far short of what is required".
At a special Congress on September 30, called to push through reform of the hurling Championship in time for next season, seven motions relating to fixtures will be put forward.
The most notable is the reintroduction of 'extra extra time' - two halves of five minutes if teams are still deadlocked following the existing two of ten minutes - for knockout league games, All-Ireland qualifiers, provincial final replays and provincial club games.
If teams are still level after 100 minutes, a free-taking competition will decide the winner, except in the case of provincial final replays.
Another motion calls for the number of days that senior inter-county players are not expected to fulfil club championship fixtures to be reduced from the current 20 to 17 before All-Ireland senior finals and 10 before all other fixtures.
A similar motion, proposing a cut to 17 and 11 days respectively, failed at Congress earlier this year.
Counties in breach of the rule would forfeit home advantage for their next National League game in the respective code but it remains to be seen how it would be decided that counties had deliberately avoided scheduling fixtures within these time periods.
The other motions relate to scheduling inter-county challenge matches, pre-season competitions being concluded before the end of the National Leagues and British GAA clubs being included in the provincial club championships, and arranging underage inter-county games.
CPA chairman Micheál Briody (below on the right) expressed his disappointment at the motion, saying: "We had hoped for one motion. A bold, brave and definitive motion that would cut through the short term planning and provide for a national fixtures plan for Club and County. A motion that would restore the balance in the GAA.
"It is the view of the CPA that the seven motions circulated fall far short of what is required from the leadership of the organisation. Leadership that repeats and uses the rhetoric of the Club and the Club player being at the centre of the GAA. There is a serious discord and disconnect between the idea and the reality in the GAA in the current era, and it is threatening the fabric of our Association.
"We are deeply concerned at the direction we are taking as an Association, with a growing imbalance between the income-generating big business wing of the GAA, directed and managed by paid officials, and the volunteer club ethos at local community level. The CPA is firmly in the latter category."
The CPA reiterated its call for three fundamental changes to fixture planning in Gaelic games: playing only club fixtures in April, playing off the club All-Ireland championships in a calendar year and forbidding fixtures at all levels in December to allow players to rest.
CPA statement in full
We have today been given sight of the motions (as attached) issued by Croke Park for the Special Congress that in their words, "Facilitate the Playing of Club Games.’
There are seven motions in total. We had hoped for one motion. A bold, brave and definitive motion that would cut through the short term planning and provide for a national fixtures plan for Club and County. A motion that would restore the balance in the GAA.
It is the view of the CPA that the seven motions circulated fall far short of what is required from the leadership of the organisation. Leadership that repeats and uses the rhetoric of the Club and the Club player being at the centre of the GAA. There is a serious discord and disconnect between the idea and the reality in the GAA in the current era, and it is threatening the fabric of our Association.
We are deeply concerned at the direction we are taking as an Association, with a growing imbalance between the income-generating big business wing of the GAA, directed and managed by paid officials, and the volunteer club ethos at local community level. The CPA is firmly in the latter category.
Individual club players and their club officials can decide if the motions circulated address their fundamental concerns about fixtures, about priorities in the GAA, about player welfare, about dropout rates and the future sustainability of their clubs, and about the duration and planning of the playing season.
It is the view of the CPA that these motions are inadequate, and tinker with issues around replays, player release to clubs, the running off of the British GAA championships. These are issues of concern in particular circumstances, but they should be addressed as part of a wider solution and a fixtures masterplan that encompasses club and county players. In reality the motions change little.
Every other national sporting body has a short, medium and long term strategy. Often their funding and accountability is predicated on planning and games development for all units.
As unpaid GAA volunteers embedded in our clubs, we are deeply disappointed that it appears the opportunity has once again been squandered to place the Club, the fundamental unit of our great Association, at the heart of planning and development.
Is it arrogance, a lack of concern for club players, or fear of real meaningful change that prevents our Association from grasping the seriousness of the issues that we face and addressing these fundamental problems?
In recent weeks we have had senior officials commenting on ticket touting, on rock concerts in Croke Park, and television deals, meanwhile the club player sits and wonders whether he should stick around for the summer months.
The CPA presented Croke Park with a national fixture plan some months back that showed how club and county can co-exist.
We pointed out that three critical elements are needed to achieve this harmony.
April designated as a club only month
Club All Irelands played in a calendar year
December a month of downtime and rest for all players.
Why aren’t these being discussed at Central Council or presented in a national strategy? These are issues that benefit the club player in a meaningful way and relate directly to the GAA’s core purpose.
These proposals were widely debated, and received positive feedback among various players, pundits, commentators and administrators. They were not perfect but they were a start.
We have also learned this week that there will be pre Congress meetings in each of the four provinces to brief county boards. At the time of the Super 8 proposals, there were similar roadshows. Each county board is being asked to send their 5 delegates to the pre Congress meeting.
Is every unit that brings forward a proposal afforded the equal option of lobbying county boards throughout the country? Is this the way GAA democracy works?
What is the purpose of these meetings? We are told that GAA is a democratic organisation and we are bound by the vote of Congress. If the GAA is serious about consultation then by all means have open meetings, but engage in an open process that can invite and take on board the views of all members. This has been done in the past for example under GAA Football Review Committee (FRC) led by Eugene McGee.
We sent correspondence to every county board secretary recently inviting and encouraging them to support a motion (that was unanimously agreed in Wexford County Board) at the next Central Council meeting that proposes to free up the month of April for club activity only.
Our hope is that this club friendly motion would be discussed at county board meetings across the country and supported at the Central Council meeting so they can understand that county and club can co-exist and that a master plan is possible with goodwill and engagement by all parties, GAA management, county boards, provincial councils and clubs.
As it stands we speak for the Club player, and will continue to do so to give them a voice.