Union chief slams Ferguson apology
Monday, 12 October 2009 15:20Sir Alex Ferguson's apology for his attack on referee Alan Wiley has today been criticised as 'half-hearted'.
The Manchester United manager was fuming with Wiley's handling of the 2-2 Barclays Premier League draw with Sunderland at Old Trafford and launched a stinging attack on the Staffordshire official immediately after the game.
Ferguson made a series of personal statements about Wiley's fitness, including a belief that he took longer than necessary to book players because he 'needed a rest'.
The views outraged Wiley's colleagues, amid claims that the referee himself felt like quitting the game because he was so upset at Ferguson.
Ferguson has said sorry for his outburst. However, Alan Leighton, national secretary of the union Prospect, was unimpressed by the Scot's apology.
Leighton told BBC Radio Five Live: 'I think it's a half-hearted apology at best really, and it probably exacerbates the position, rather than resolving it.
'He clearly hasn't retracted the statement about Alan being unfit so it's not an apology for the main offence caused - and then he widens it to question the fitness of other referees, so he seems to be opening another can of worms which I don't think is very helpful at all.
'Referees are very fit...they have sports scientists who test them regularly throughout the season. They don't just pass a fitness test at the start of the season.
'Their body fats and BMI are regularly monitored, there are get-togethers every two or three weeks where they are put through extensive training and testing.'
Ferguson has been asked to submit his own thoughts to the FA by Friday and could be facing a hefty fine, or a touchline ban.
And Leighton continued: 'I think the punishment should be a UEFA-type coaching ban, which is rather more than a touchline ban.
'Referees always accept decisions are going to be pored over - they have no problem with legitimate criticism.
'What's problematic is when the integrity and key components of refereeing are being questioned in a totally unwarranted and unfounded way - and we will defend our members when they are.'
