Entertainment
Gaming Blog

Can the PS3 become the console of the masses?

PS3The big news at GamesCon 2009 was Sony’s announcement on Wednesday that the redesigned Playstation 3, now called the PS3 Slim, will retail at €299 in Europe. That is a price-drop of €100 in one go, and brought it to less than half the intimidating €629 the device was priced at on launch just over two years ago.

Clearly, Sony are hoping to reach a much broader audience with the console – ideally, the PS3 will replicate the journey taken by the PS2. Can the PS3 Slim – previously and elite and exclusive piece of kit - become the well loved console of the masses?

To recap, the Playstation 2 has sold a phenomenal 138.8 million consoles worldwide, with 51.8 million of those sales occurring within Europe, since 2000. The PS3 has sold 23.7 million units worldwide (10 million in Europe) in a quarter of the same period of time.

But the PS2 also started fairly slowly and only really took over as the dominant console with the launch of help of the Grand Theft Auto series; can the PS3 push on in similar fashion?

A major factor over the next 18 months or so will be the almost total lack of opposition from rival consoles.

Even Microsoft did not appear interested in pushing the X-Box at GamesCon, where it was relegated to a rather deserted area at the rear of a display hall. Quality control is still a major issue - a recent report by Game Informer magazine found that the X-Box suffers from a whopping 52.4% failure rate, with 41.2% failing twice; my colleague Rob Wright is not alone. Microsoft have also declined to respond to the Sony move with a price drop of their own and in truth it looks as though the X-Box, darling of the 2008 Christmas market, is nearing the end of the road.

The second part of the puzzle for the PS3 is the redesign and the addition of new features. The new slimmed down version replaces what was, in truth, a bit of a hulking brute. It is 32% smaller, 36% lighter and, arguably most importantly, 34% more efficient.

That adds up to a better looking machine that will fit much more comfortably into the average living room. The downsides are that, unlike the current version of the PS3, the new PS3 will not offer backwards compatibility with Playstation 2 games, nor will it enable users to install Linux to their hard drive.

But there is plenty on offer to more than make up for that.

Two new features in particular may help the console, and the internet itself, make the long predicted transition from the quieter corners of most houses to the centre of the living room.

First, the PS3 will allow users to access on-demand services such as the BBC iPlayer in certain territories. Irish PS3 owners south of the border will not benefit from this as soon as customers in the UK, for whom it will come on stream in November 2009. However, I understand that, moves are afoot to bring on-demand services to PS3 owners in the Republic in the near future.

Secondly, PS3 owners will also be able to rent or buy high quality downloadable versions of movie releases through their PS3s. For many consumers, this will represent a significant move towards a much more user-friendly internet purchase option than the PC.

To make this happen, Sony have conclude a massive range of deals with the major film studios (remember the ‘residuals’ strikes threatened by actors a few months ago), which should give the PS3 purchasing a more ‘legit’ feel than that with attaches itself to the PC. Can you imagine the whole family watching a mediocre quality downloaded movie on a PC? Probably not. Make that a film downloaded from the PS3 in HD that will play uninterrupted on a high-end TV and it arguably becomes far more likely.

So, arguably for the first time, there is a realistic prospect of large numbers of Irish consumers using the internet for family entertainment. This trend is being mirrored on the software side, with titles such as Heavy Rain set to blur the line between gaming and action-drama film genres as never before.

Clearly, the above developments have major implications for retailers. On the one hand, the drop in the price of the PS3 is itself is excellent news and improve theirs prospects for what is a potentially rocky Christmas period. On the other hand, the PS3 can potentially act as a means for consumers to cut the middleman out of software and DVD rentals – bad news in the long term. The potential loss of DVD rental sales is somewhat offset by the voucher/card system designed to assuage consumer concerns over credit card use on the web.

Clearly, the potential stumbling block both in Ireland and worldwide is the recession. Ireland has undoubtedly been hit harder than most by the global downturn and for a lot of customers who might previously have been thought of as likely PS3 owners, the €299 price-tag may still be a bridge too far.

On the other hand, people are still buying ‘09 cars, and there is no doubt that the recession has hit some much harder than others.

All in all, the PS3 Slim is a much improved product with 25% knocked off the price and it should achieve a far more significant market-share in the coming months on the back of those facts alone.

Brendan Cole


 


Comments:

Great news for consumers however I still think that the lack of really good exclusive games is the PS3's downfall. Xbox has the Halo series, Gears of War etc. and most of the decent games developed for the PS3 make their way to the Xbox (FF XIII). I know there are exceptions I'm just making an example. I think that pushing a console as a media centre is aiming at a very niche market and the majority of people that have consoles are only interested in good games. Not to start yet another console war, but I am a 360 owner and will be until Sony manage to regain their dominance with exclusive titles. I'm not going to buy a PS3 for Metal Gear and Gran Turismo. Flawed as it may be (and I have been victim to the RROD), I think the 360 is a gamers console and Sony need to realise that before they pump their money into the media side of things.

Posted by Aaron on August 25, 2009 at 04:14 PM BST #

Judging by gamescon, your beloved xbox is consigned to the scrap heap .Microsoft are'nt even matching sonys price drop, they know not to fight a losing battle and how they can justify that failure rate is beyond me, a product from a smaller company wouldnt even make it past quality control never mind full launch luckily they are microsoft , shocking.

Posted by John Belia on August 25, 2009 at 09:21 PM BST #

I completely agree with Aaron. Lack of exclusive titles the exact reason I will stick with my flawed 360 thank you very much. I had a ps2 and ps1 for that matter and Gran Turismo was special but now that Microsoft have Forza I think it has left Sony without a big reason to go with the ps3. On the other hand Microsoft have Halo and Gears of War both amazing titles on and offline. Again I think Aaron got is right, Sony need to rethink the line they're going down as the multimedia market just isnt what gamers are after and these consoles are gamers consoles theyre not fancy family friendly wii type machines. If I want multimedia I go to my laptop not my 360 Anyway to summarise I wont be buying a ps3 299euro or otherwise. If it was half that price I would still find it hard to justify buying one. ps just not interested in the blue ray drive either. personal thing dont watch a lot of dvds.

Posted by fred on August 26, 2009 at 11:30 AM BST #

I think the article needs to do some better research - movie downloads (and now full game downloads) in SD and HD have been available for ages now on the Xbox 360 so its not something exclusive to the PS3. Also in the UK the Xbox will be offering Sky content (including sports) from late 2009. Combine this with Last.FM, Facebook and Twitter and the convergence factor of the Xbox is significantly better than the PS3. .....also Microsoft is cutting the cost of its Xbox 360 Elite edition (even though it has raised the Arcade version).

Posted by donny on August 26, 2009 at 12:18 PM BST #

I disagree but respect the opinion of Aaron and fred. Im quite interested to read the comments here suggesting the PS3 is a multimedia console where as the 360 is not. Movie rentals is a huge business for Microsoft in the US with its Netflix deal, the console plays DVDs and also can be hooked into Windows Media Centre to stream all your media. With Project Natal on the way they are completely pitching the entertainment device to gamers. Although a lot of franchises are now multiplatform Sony still have some big guns. Gran Turismo, God Of War, Uncharted, Heavy Rain, LittleBigPlanet,Killzone,Ratchet n Clank,The Last Guardian,Infamous,Resistance,Motorstorm to name a few. Although the exclusives of the PS2 are no longer exclusive its the way of the industry now. Bigger install base equals more money for developers. The PS3 is a good step by Sony to get PS2 owners to upgrade and at 299 your getting amazing value for money.

Posted by Paul Mc on August 26, 2009 at 01:03 PM BST #

I have a 360 and a PS3. my PS3 collects dust, why? XBOX LIVE is 100 times better than the PS3 version. for me the future of gaming is online and xbox are miles ahead. Playstation need to redesign the dated and useless pad instead of makeing the machine smaller, pointless!

Posted by chris adamson on August 27, 2009 at 10:33 AM BST #

Can you use the PS3 to stream movies from your PC like you can with the X-Box?

Posted by McCleanser on August 27, 2009 at 01:18 PM BST #

You have all forgotten the Playstation Eye. It is like the other motion controllers to be honest, but the fact is Sony released a motion controller before the Wii existed. The new version has more potential then the old one and is planned for next year. There is a movie service in North America for some time now. You can access Twitter and Facebook through the Browser. The PSN itself is free (no offense to Xbox live, but the price for it just is not worth it to myself.) Also, I find the lack of faith in the current exclusives for PS3 to be surprising. It has Uncharted 2, Ratchet and Clank (one that most people constantly forget), White Knight Chronicles, Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2, Free Realms and Demon's Souls for this year and then there is the first three months of 2010. There's still COD:MW2 and to be honest, Gears is too chunky for my taste. I'll get one when my brother leaves with his. However, I'd still like to try the other Xbox exclusives. It is good value for the games you can get.

Posted by Day Maker on August 27, 2009 at 01:42 PM BST #

Lots to respond to here, but brief notice to say the X-Box WILL now be dropping in price......http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/finance/2009/0828/1224253392113.html

Posted by Brendan Cole on August 28, 2009 at 11:15 AM BST #

I'm a hard core gamer. I still have my old snes and sega master system. I played c64's and bought a ps. I then moved to Wii and PSP. I play the odd game on the Xbox and PS3 but it makes me chuckle when I hear my pals boast about games like COD4 on the PSP. I've always loved these consoles but the graphics on pc games can never me matched by consoles. Whether your playing Crysis, Left4Dead, COD4, call of Juarez, GRAW etc the PC is for hard core gamers and anything else is just a fun fast version at best. I love consoles but if your serious about quality gaming pc's are where it's at. And the evidence is in the money we spend on the technology. A pc might be more expensive but you can customize it and upgrade it. Yes you get the odd compatibility issue but the end result is quality in a league of its own.

Posted by Mick on August 28, 2009 at 12:34 PM BST #

Not a hope , have a lot of PS2 games, why could they not do backward compatability???Also on the download side, I heard that films from the net are not 1080p so isnt it kinda pointless having this movie and you have a blu ray player and Full HD TV if this is tru? and one last thing, what good games have come out in the last few months, am bit bored waiting on anything good to come out, so not a hope of trading in my bulky machine,

Posted by mark.conroy on August 28, 2009 at 01:36 PM BST #

Why is the PS3 better? Well frankly I don't give a hoot about visual quality, the online service and the XBox exclusives I'm missing out on. It comes down to this: A 52% failure rate of XBoxes. I mean... that's AWFUL! If a car dealer told you "This car has a 50% chance of breaking down so badly that you'll have no choice but to replace it" would you buy? I wouldn't. So people say the XBox is cheaper... not if you have to buy two of the damn things it's not.

Posted by Conor on August 28, 2009 at 01:46 PM BST #

"The PSN itself is free (no offense to Xbox live, but the price for it just is not worth it to myself.) " You are having a laugh Day Maker. You can get a subscription on the web for 30euro for a year instead of the 60euro you would normally pay. Either price is still WELL worth the money as online gaming on the 360 is light years ahead of the ps3. Simple as that. Your not living in the real world if you think otherwise.

Posted by fred on August 28, 2009 at 03:26 PM BST #

the ps3 can stream movies. I know that the PSN is free maybe for a reason...€60 for a year is well worth it when u play online games everyday. get both consoles and then make up ur mind

Posted by 192.168.24.19 on August 28, 2009 at 04:20 PM BST #

Game informer did not discover there was a 53% fail rate. They had a pole where people anonymously could post whatever they wanted without proof. It was hardly representative, and without fanboy-ism. In many ways, it was as biased a statistic as this is an article.

Posted by Steven Arnell on August 29, 2009 at 12:33 AM BST #

I own both consoles, and both have their merits, consoles are for gaming, if i want to go all multimedia i go to my laptop, i want my console to provide me with good deep games, not listen to music, watch a video and tweet while trying to clear the last mission of metal gear solid or halo, the xbox just gets the edge for me, the achievement system (for which the ps3 trophy system is a poor catchup), the xbox live experience and the GOOD exclusive games make it the best choice for gamers. However i still play my ps3 for titles like mgs4 and gran turismo, but i think considering resistance and uncharted good games is very hard. The ps3 can catchup with the 360 if they make there online service more friendly and get one one really really good exclsive title. time will tell if sony heed the cries of gamers from now on.

Posted by Brian, Kildare on August 29, 2009 at 11:54 AM BST #

The fact of the matter is that the xbox360 has the most immersive and enjoyable games. Gears of War and Halo blew everyting away. Then when you think you can't squeeze any more enjoyment from Gears of War you go online - what an experience. 52% failure rate doesn't matter a damn because you just keep going back with the warranty to get a new one.

Posted by Owen on August 31, 2009 at 11:25 PM BST #

I own both consoles and have to say while the PS3 is a vastly superior machine, the Xbox live is light years ahead of Sony's counterpart. Any game worth playing online i will always get for the 360, whereas all other games i will buy for PS3. I would doubt the RROD is as low as 53% to be honest, i mean every person i know, including myself, who has bought a 360 has had it happen to them AT LEAST once. Not to mention the other errors that occur, such as the xbox not reading games or asking you to put the game in a Xbox 360 machine???!!! Simply put the PS3 is a better machine with terrible online support whereas the 360 has great online support, but the machine is as reliable as wet cardboard.

Posted by Rory on September 01, 2009 at 11:34 AM BST #

I don't think this reporter has done a very good job reporting on gamescon. So the PS3 is now slim. Great. It has lost it's main selling point of being backwards compatible. The Xbox360 received a price cut which puts it 30 quid cheaper. The Xbox is far from dead - has the reporter not bothered to notice the hype surrounding Project Natal which will revolutionise home entertainment??? Also developer support for Sony has fallen incredibly in the alst 2 years with many of the main developers saying the Sony hardware is just too difficult and restrictive to make games for. It's like having the fastest car in the race but no driver.

Posted by Alan on September 02, 2009 at 03:14 PM BST #

Alan - As I have said before (several times!), I don't think Project Natal or any motion sensor device will 'revolutionize gaming'. If I want to kick a ball etc, I prefer do it outside......

Posted by Brendan Cole on September 03, 2009 at 09:46 AM BST #

http://www.rte.ie/ie/entertainmentgaming/entry/motion_sensor

Posted by Brendan Cole on September 03, 2009 at 09:47 AM BST #

The PS3 can stream movies - once you have a wireless system in your house. Download the free software (I have Tversity) from the web and follow the instructions. The PS3 will pick this up automatically and add a link to each relevant menu on the X-bar. I have a TV that can do this also without any media centre - happy days.

Posted by Keith on September 03, 2009 at 02:30 PM BST #

I agree with breden, Alan with a normal controller you can sit and relax and enjoy your game, I played the Wii and after 10 mins I was on the couch nearly asleep, some people will love but others like myself will hate it, and Brenden you do a great job reporting for us keep it up...

Posted by kenny on September 04, 2009 at 09:36 AM BST #

id software (the guys behind quake and doom) are developing a new game called Rage for the PC, 360 & PS3 - They have practically finished developing the game, and have been getting speeds of 60fps on the 360 and PC, but they're only getting a meagre 20-25fps on the PS3 - Which means they've had to spend buckets more time and money, compartmentalising the game for the PS3, which will slow down the game in the finished product. Developers are being turned off the PS3 because it is so cumbersome to develop for, which means people who develop multiplat titles will end up favoring the PC & 360, for financial reasons if anything, and you will see more exclusives in the long run coming to the 360, and PC games being ported to it also. PS3 will still pay for exclusives, but the developers don't lke it.

Posted by Willy on September 04, 2009 at 09:54 AM BST #

Thanks Kenny.....I appreciate that!

Posted by Brendan Cole on September 04, 2009 at 11:01 AM BST #

There will always be Xbox fanboys out there. Aaron is right when he mentions Halo and gears as good xbox exclusives, although seems to ignore Killzone and inFAMOUS to name but two. The ps3's price tag has always been its Achilles heel. It is a superior piece of kit than the xbox (built in wireless, bluray) although the its was also a lot more expensive than the xbox. With the new slim design and lower price tag I think the PS3 wll become a geuine challenger to the xbox.

Posted by Kennyd on September 08, 2009 at 08:38 AM BST #

The PS3 is an excellent console,although it is far over-shadowed by the Xbox360 in terms of value,playabilty,user-friendliness and most imporatantly selction of games,yes the PS3 has slightly better graphics and a blu-ray engine,but as has been proven,graphics dont make games good,gameplay is the the key,and Xbox360 has a selection second to none,were the PS3 has a very slim choice in decent games,also although you have to pay for it,Xbox live is far more user friendly and more reliable to use then PS3s glitchy broadband service,the customer service at microsoft fot Xbox support is also superb,trying to ring Sony is like trying to ring the pope,PS3 has a long way to go if it is going to attempt topple the far superior Xbox360

Posted by Ro Clarke on September 16, 2009 at 11:19 AM BST #

Post a Comment:
Comments are closed for this entry.