When a win is not a win …

Monday 12 March 2012 12.26

By Richard Downes, Washington Correspondent

Pity Mitt Romney. Before Super Tuesday all the commentators said that if he won a majority of the states being contested, he would be strengthened as a candidate. But on Sober Wednesday that had all changed.

He won six out of ten but still they were not happy. He was an ‘unconvincing’ candidate who ‘hadn’t sealed the deal’. Why the disconnect?

Well it is partly because the commentariat is keen to keep the story alive and partly because Mitt Romney is keeping it alive himself by his inability to convincingly win key states. Let’s be clear here.

Mitt Romney is probably the only candidate who can win the nomination. He is the only one with the machine and the money to go all the way and challenge Barack Obama. He has the backing of the grey suits in the party and is likely to sweep the nomination in the giant states of California and New York.

But he cannot win in the deep south and to try to appeal to the republican base there, he is moving ever closer to the right wing fringe, particularly on emigration.

That may well come back to haunt him in the general election if he becomes the candidate. After all, some of the most marginal states in the country have significant latino minorities which are sensitive about the issue.

But that is all in the future …. In the meantime, there’s the small matter of trying to ‘seal the deal’.

3 Responses to When a win is not a win …

  1. Sunil Kumar says:

    Whats with a picture of only 3 candidates? You also forgot to write about the fact that romney was reported in the media as winning the v.i. vote. But on http://www.vigop.com, they report ron paul as winning. Where is your conscience??

  2. T. Gerard Bennett says:

    I think you’ll find that that with Mr Romney, he has no interest in emmigration “… right wing fringe, particularly on emigration” but on immigration.

    RTÉ’s fixation on the primary campaign is odd – the issues are ENTIRELY local (i.e., US only) as foreign policy has few followers in the US. As a former resident (to end 2002) and having lived there through various elections, serious foreign policy debate is of minimal interest. Once candidates are decided then, yes, maybe interest on this side of the Atlantic but until then, it is only the American-phobes (like myself perhaps!) who have a modicum of interest. If US foreign policy has no takers in the primary campaigns, then simiilarly, US domestic issues generate much yawning here!

  3. bob says:

    This picture is typical of what Ron Paul supporters claim is the intentional exclusion of his candidacy from the election. If you look at BBC, it also pretends he doesn’t exist. If you weren’t following the election by tracking American alternative media, you would never know he existed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>